[WIP] Change wording of voters #3326
Conversation
| * ``VoterInterface::ACCESS_ABSTAIN``: The voter cannot decide if the user is granted or not | ||
| * ``VoterInterface::ACCESS_DENIED``: The user is not allowed to access the application | ||
| * ``VoterInterface::ACCESS_DENIED``: The user is not allowed to access something |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am not sure with these play of words and clarifications later
would resource be better?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe the base phrasing would be something like Asked authorization will be refused by this voter. Stressing that we're dealing with a specific question, and that other Voters may decide, is important.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think resource is better than something.
[WIP] Change wording of voters
|
Hi guys! I've used @romaricdrigon's suggestion at sha: 2f89b3a with some other changes. This article is quite old, and I think now it doesn't really explain things very well (for example, it never shows you how to use the voter - which I think causes some of the confusion). But, that's no worry - when I merge in #3138, I'll look at both articles. Right now, I think there would be a lot repeated between the 2, so we'll need to fix that :). Thanks Florian and everyone else! |
A paragraph about what "something" can be is necessary ?