Merge pull request #3326 from FlorianLB/voters_wording

[WIP] Change wording of voters

Author: weaverryan

cookbook/security/voters.rst

@@ -40,12 +40,12 @@ The ``vote()`` method must implement the business logic that verifies whether
 or not the user is granted access. This method must return one of the following
 values:
 
-* ``VoterInterface::ACCESS_GRANTED``: The user is allowed to access the application
+* ``VoterInterface::ACCESS_GRANTED``: The user is allowed to access something
 * ``VoterInterface::ACCESS_ABSTAIN``: The voter cannot decide if the user is granted or not
-* ``VoterInterface::ACCESS_DENIED``: The user is not allowed to access the application
+* ``VoterInterface::ACCESS_DENIED``: The user is not allowed to access something
 
 In this example, you'll check if the user's IP address matches against a list of
-blacklisted addresses. If the user's IP is blacklisted, you'll return
+blacklisted addresses and "something" will be the application. If the user's IP is blacklisted, you'll return
 ``VoterInterface::ACCESS_DENIED``, otherwise you'll return
 ``VoterInterface::ACCESS_ABSTAIN`` as this voter's purpose is only to deny
 access, not to grant access.