Skip to content

Rework test adapter project #284

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2024
Merged

Rework test adapter project #284

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2024

Conversation

josesimoes
Copy link
Member

@josesimoes josesimoes commented Nov 26, 2024

Description

  • Fix target framework moniker.
  • Adjust nuspec accordingly.
  • Update runsettings in PoC project.
  • Remove unnecessary properties in project.
  • Update nanoFramework.Tools.Debugger.Net to v2.5.4.
  • Update Microsoft.TestPlatform.ObjectModel to v17.12.0.

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots

Types of changes

  • Improvement (non-breaking change that improves a feature, code or algorithm)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue with code or algorithm)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality to code)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Config and build (change in the configuration and build system, has no impact on code or features)
  • Dependencies (update dependencies and changes associated, has no impact on code or features)
  • Unit Tests (add new Unit Test(s) or improved existing one(s), has no impact on code or features)
  • Documentation (changes or updates in the documentation, has no impact on code or features)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project (only if there are changes in source code).
  • My changes require an update to the documentation (there are changes that require the docs website to be updated).
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly (the changes require an update on the docs in this repo).
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have tested everything locally and all new and existing tests passed (only if there are changes in source code).
  • I have added new tests to cover my changes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced support for the new target framework .NET 6.0, enhancing compatibility and performance.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated several dependencies to improve stability and functionality, including Microsoft.TestPlatform.ObjectModel and nanoFramework.Tools.Debugger.Net.
  • Chores

    • Adjusted various dependency versions to ensure optimal performance and compatibility across frameworks.

- Fix target framework moniker.
- Adjust nuspec accordingly.
- Update runsettings in PoC project.
- Remove unnecessary properties in project.
- Update nanoFramework.Tools.Debugger.Net to v2.5.4.
- Update Microsoft.TestPlatform.ObjectModel to v17.12.0.
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces updates to the packages.lock.json file, including several dependency version changes and the addition of a new target framework, net6.0. Key changes involve updating the versions of Microsoft.TestPlatform.ObjectModel and nanoFramework.Tools.Debugger.Net, while downgrading CommunityToolkit.Mvvm, Microsoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces, and System.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe. The new framework section for net6.0 mirrors the existing dependencies from the .NETFramework,Version=v4.8 section, ensuring compatibility with .NET 6.0.

Changes

File Change Summary
source/TestAdapter/packages.lock.json - Updated Microsoft.TestPlatform.ObjectModel from 17.10.0 to 17.12.0
- Updated nanoFramework.Tools.Debugger.Net from 2.5.3 to 2.5.4
- Downgraded CommunityToolkit.Mvvm from 8.2.2 to 7.1.2
- Downgraded Microsoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces from 7.0.0 to 5.0.0
- Downgraded System.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe from 6.0.0 to 4.5.3
- Added new framework section for net6.0 with corresponding dependencies

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • Ellerbach

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
source/TestAdapter/packages.lock.json (1)

244-292: Appropriate platform-specific dependencies

The net6.0 target correctly includes platform-specific runtime dependencies for System.IO.Ports across different operating systems (Linux ARM/ARM64/x64, OSX ARM64/x64). This ensures proper cross-platform support.

Consider documenting the supported platforms in the project's README to help users understand the cross-platform capabilities.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ed9e540 and b2aac54.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
  • poc/TestOfTestFrameworkByReference/nano.runsettings is excluded by none and included by none
  • source/TestAdapter/nanoFramework.TestAdapter.csproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • source/package.nuspec is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/TestAdapter/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
source/TestAdapter/packages.lock.json (3)

30-32: Version updates align with PR objectives

The updates to Microsoft.TestPlatform.ObjectModel (17.12.0) and nanoFramework.Tools.Debugger.Net (2.5.4) are appropriate minor version bumps that should help resolve the test adapter loading issues mentioned in the PR objectives.

Also applies to: 39-41


170-312: Well-structured multi-targeting setup

The addition of the net6.0 target framework is well-organized and maintains consistency with the .NETFramework,Version=v4.8 section. The dependency versions are aligned between both frameworks, which is good for maintainability.


62-67: Verify compatibility impact of dependency downgrades

Several dependencies have been significantly downgraded:

  • CommunityToolkit.Mvvm: 8.2.2 → 7.1.2
  • System.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe: 6.0.0 → 4.5.3

While this might be necessary for compatibility, please ensure:

  1. These versions are still receiving security updates
  2. No critical bug fixes or security patches from newer versions are needed
  3. The downgrades don't introduce compatibility issues with other dependencies

Also applies to: 140-141

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the dependency usage and version constraints.


Dependency downgrades appear to be safe in this context

The verification shows:

  • No security vulnerabilities reported for CommunityToolkit.Mvvm
  • No direct usage of MVVM patterns or Observable objects in the codebase
  • The project targets both .NET Framework 4.8 and .NET 6.0, which explains the need for older package versions for compatibility
  • The downgraded packages appear only in the lock file, suggesting they are transitive dependencies rather than direct references

The version downgrades appear to be a deliberate choice for maintaining multi-targeting compatibility without introducing any apparent risks.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any direct usages of removed features from newer versions
rg -l "ObservableObject|INotifyPropertyChanged|NotifyPropertyChanged" 

# Check for any security advisories
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NUGET, package: "CommunityToolkit.Mvvm") {
    nodes {
      advisory {
        summary
        severity
        publishedAt
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
      firstPatchedVersion {
        identifier
      }
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 428


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check package references in csproj files
fd -e csproj -x cat {}

# Check if there are any specific version constraints in other lock files
fd -e json -e config --exec grep -l "CommunityToolkit.Mvvm\|Microsoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces\|System.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe" {}

# Look for MVVM related base classes or implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ : ObservableObject { $$$ }'

Length of output: 1539

@josesimoes josesimoes merged commit 42eaf18 into main Nov 26, 2024
5 checks passed
@josesimoes josesimoes deleted the update-refs branch November 26, 2024 20:01
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Apr 17, 2025
14 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants