-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
Update nanoFramework.Tools.Debugger.NET #282
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)source/TestAdapter/packages.lock.json (2)
The update of nanoFramework.Tools.Debugger.Net to v2.5.3 includes significant dependency changes:
Let's verify if these changes are intentional and documented: ✅ Verification successfulDependency changes are aligned with package references The verification shows that:
The changes in packages.lock.json are consistent with the project's direct dependencies and represent a clean transition to the new version of nanoFramework.Tools.Debugger.Net. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check release notes and changelog for v2.5.3
gh api repos/nanoframework/nf-debugger/releases/tags/v2.5.3 --jq .body
# Search for any dependency-related issues or PRs
gh search issues "repo:nanoframework/nf-debugger Polly downgrade OR TimeProvider" --json title,url,state
Length of output: 618 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the package references in the project file
fd -e csproj . source/TestAdapter/ --exec cat {}
# Check if there are any direct references to the removed packages
rg -l "Polly\.Core|Microsoft\.Bcl\.TimeProvider" source/TestAdapter/
# Look for Polly usage patterns to understand the impact
ast-grep --pattern 'using Polly;'
Length of output: 1415
The downgrade of Polly from 8.5.0 to 7.2.4 is a significant change that could affect retry policies and circuit breaker implementations. Let's check for potential breaking changes: Consider documenting:
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Description
Motivation and Context
How Has This Been Tested?
Screenshots
Types of changes
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit