Skip to content

build: dgeni bazel target misses runtime fine-grained dep #15649

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

devversion
Copy link
Member

Due to the fact that various targets only depend on their TypeScript
source Bazel target, the logic that is reponsible for determining the
Bazel managed dependency path is not working because the
nodejs_binary rule is not able to determine the NodeModuleInfo
Bazel provider from the TypeScript compilation provider output.

See: https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_nodejs/blob/fe1d1c03630f999c57a63dc3fe1f6ad52ff61c6a/internal/node/node.bzl#L60

Therefore we need to make sure that we don't transitively depend on
fine-grained dependencies (such as @npm//highlight.js) which
seem to be transitively brought in by the TypeScript target. This is not
correct and prone to unexpected failures (as we experienced on master)

Due to the fact that various targets only depend on their TypeScript
source Bazel target, the logic that is reponsible for determining the
Bazel managed dependency path is not working because the
`nodejs_binary` rule is not able to determine the `NodeModuleInfo`
Bazel provider from the TypeScript compilation provider output.

See: https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_nodejs/blob/fe1d1c03630f999c57a63dc3fe1f6ad52ff61c6a/internal/node/node.bzl#L60

Therefore we need to make sure that we don't transitively depend on
fine-grained dependencies (such as `@npm//highlight.js`) which
*seem* to be transitively brought in by the TypeScript target. This is not
correct and prone to unexpected failures (as we experienced on `master)
@devversion devversion requested a review from jelbourn as a code owner March 29, 2019 10:49
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Mar 29, 2019
@devversion devversion added pr: merge safe target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release labels Mar 29, 2019
@mmalerba mmalerba added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker labels Mar 29, 2019
@ngbot
Copy link

ngbot bot commented Mar 29, 2019

I see that you just added the pr: merge ready label, but the following checks are still failing:
    failure status "branch-manager" is failing

If you want your PR to be merged, it has to pass all the CI checks.

If you can't get the PR to a green state due to flakes or broken master, please try rebasing to master and/or restarting the CI job. If that fails and you believe that the issue is not due to your change, please contact the caretaker and ask for help.

@jelbourn jelbourn merged commit 03fb711 into angular:master Mar 29, 2019
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 10, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants