feat: add accessor protocol support and refactor stats/base/nanvarianceyc

[rahulptl165]

---

type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report:

• task: lint_filenames status: passed
• task: lint_editorconfig status: passed
• task: lint_markdown status: passed
• task: lint_package_json status: na
• task: lint_repl_help status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_src status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_cli status: na
• task: lint_javascript_examples status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_tests status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: passed
• task: lint_python status: na
• task: lint_r status: na
• task: lint_c_src status: na
• task: lint_c_examples status: na
• task: lint_c_benchmarks status: na
• task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na
• task: lint_shell status: na
• task: lint_typescript_declarations status: passed
• task: lint_typescript_tests status: passed
• task: lint_license_headers status: passed ---

Resolves #5678 .

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• Adds a new file accessors.js.
• Modified nanvarianceyc.js.
• Modified ndarray.js.
• Modified benchmarks, examples, tests, docs/types, docs/repl and readme files to include accessor protocol support.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

• resolves [RFC]: refactor and add protocol support to stats/base/nanvarianceyc #5678

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
stats/base/nanvarianceyc	$\color{green}379/379$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}46/46$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}3/3$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}379/379$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

[kgryte]

LGTM. Thank you for opening a relatively clean PR. Only had a few nits that I went ahead and fixed.

[rahulptl165]

Hi @kgryte, Thank you for quick review and fixing those nits. I'll make sure to avoid those mistakes in the future.