-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
Markdown port of new SIPs process #539
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There are four major steps in the SIP process: | ||
|
||
1. Initial informal discussion (2 weeks) | ||
2. Submission |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about, for consistency reasons, we make this point also contain a time reference? E.g. (at the submitter's convenience)
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good, but it will give the impression that the author has to meet a deadline (say, 1 month) when he doesn't, it's the Process Lead who does. If we add a time reference, then we should reword the title to 'Submission and Validation'.
a SIP or needs more work. | ||
|
||
|
||
### Submission |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See my comment about the title of this section above.
Ok, I think this is more or less ready. |
Just one more thing, Sébastien has asked for this: “e” with “é”. |
Oops. |
Wait no, I already resolved it. It's not showing in the diff though |
It's in this commit already: 90ae929 |
Merging :) |
- Sébastien Doeraene ([@sjrd](https://github.com/sjrd)), EPFL | ||
- Eugene Burmako ([@xeno-by](https://github.com/xeno-by)), EPFL | ||
- Andrew Marki ([@som-snytt](https://github.com/som-snytt)), independent | ||
- Josh Suereth ([@jsuereth](https://github.com/jsuereth)), Google |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jsuereth I wonder if you would prefer “independent“ here, since you aren't really “representing” Google?
https://docs.google.com/document/d/18qAl1BvKM5OjyHmvw0RNbpcjKjJp4H9Cdj7any4-i9M/edit?pref=2&pli=1#