Skip to content

Markdown port of new SIPs process #539

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 12, 2016
Merged

Markdown port of new SIPs process #539

merged 5 commits into from
Jul 12, 2016

Conversation

heathermiller
Copy link
Member

There are four major steps in the SIP process:

1. Initial informal discussion (2 weeks)
2. Submission
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about, for consistency reasons, we make this point also contain a time reference? E.g. (at the submitter's convenience)?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good, but it will give the impression that the author has to meet a deadline (say, 1 month) when he doesn't, it's the Process Lead who does. If we add a time reference, then we should reword the title to 'Submission and Validation'.

a SIP or needs more work.


### Submission
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See my comment about the title of this section above.

@heathermiller
Copy link
Member Author

Ok, I think this is more or less ready.

@jvican
Copy link
Member

jvican commented Jul 12, 2016

Just one more thing, Sébastien has asked for this: “e” with “é”.

@heathermiller
Copy link
Member Author

Oops.

@heathermiller
Copy link
Member Author

Wait no, I already resolved it. It's not showing in the diff though

@heathermiller
Copy link
Member Author

It's in this commit already: 90ae929

@heathermiller
Copy link
Member Author

Merging :)

@heathermiller heathermiller merged commit cfbfbda into master Jul 12, 2016
@heathermiller heathermiller deleted the new-sips-proc branch July 12, 2016 14:25
- Sébastien Doeraene ([@sjrd](https://github.com/sjrd)), EPFL
- Eugene Burmako ([@xeno-by](https://github.com/xeno-by)), EPFL
- Andrew Marki ([@som-snytt](https://github.com/som-snytt)), independent
- Josh Suereth ([@jsuereth](https://github.com/jsuereth)), Google
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jsuereth I wonder if you would prefer “independent“ here, since you aren't really “representing” Google?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants