Skip to content

core: unstably expose atomic_compare_exchange so stdarch can use it #141687

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2025

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

Due to rust-lang/stdarch#1655, cleaning up the atomic intrinsics will be a bunch of extra work: stdarch directly calls them here.

Instead of duplicating that match, stdarch should use what we have in libcore, so let's expose that.

r? @bjorn3

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 28, 2025
@RalfJung RalfJung force-pushed the atomic_compare_exchange branch from ccf9675 to 2593df8 Compare May 28, 2025 13:20
@bjorn3
Copy link
Member

bjorn3 commented May 28, 2025

@bors r+ rollup=always

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 28, 2025

📌 Commit 2593df8 has been approved by bjorn3

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 28, 2025
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2025
Rollup of 16 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #136429 (GCI: At their def site, actually wfcheck the where-clause & always eval free lifetime-generic constants)
 - #138139 (Emit warning while outputs is not exe and prints linkage info)
 - #141104 (Test(fs): Fix `test_eq_windows_file_type` for Windows 7)
 - #141477 (Path::with_extension: show that it adds an extension where one did no…)
 - #141533 (clean up old rintf leftovers)
 - #141612 (Call out possibility of invariant result in variance markers)
 - #141638 (Use `builtin_index` instead of hand-rolling it)
 - #141643 (ci: verify that codebuild jobs use ghcr.io)
 - #141675 (Reorder `ast::ItemKind::{Struct,Enum,Union}` fields.)
 - #141680 (replace TraitRef link memory.md)
 - #141682 (interpret/allocation: Fixup type for `alloc_bytes`)
 - #141683 (Handle ed2021 precise capturing of unsafe binder)
 - #141684 (rustbook: Bump versions of `onig` and `onig_sys`)
 - #141687 (core: unstably expose atomic_compare_exchange so stdarch can use it)
 - #141690 (Add `rustc_diagnostic_item` to `sys::Mutex` methods)
 - #141702 (Add eholk to compiler reviewer rotation)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit f4dcb7f into rust-lang:master May 29, 2025
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.89.0 milestone May 29, 2025
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2025
Rollup merge of #141687 - RalfJung:atomic_compare_exchange, r=bjorn3

core: unstably expose atomic_compare_exchange so stdarch can use it

Due to rust-lang/stdarch#1655, cleaning up the atomic intrinsics will be a bunch of extra work: stdarch directly calls them [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/stdarch/blob/8764244589373b8b48864c0ad11fd9233c672249/crates/core_arch/src/x86_64/cmpxchg16b.rs#L58-L74).

Instead of duplicating that match, stdarch should use what we have in libcore, so let's expose that.

r? `@bjorn3`
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the atomic_compare_exchange branch May 29, 2025 09:51
github-actions bot pushed a commit to model-checking/verify-rust-std that referenced this pull request May 30, 2025
…r=bjorn3

core: unstably expose atomic_compare_exchange so stdarch can use it

Due to rust-lang/stdarch#1655, cleaning up the atomic intrinsics will be a bunch of extra work: stdarch directly calls them [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/stdarch/blob/8764244589373b8b48864c0ad11fd9233c672249/crates/core_arch/src/x86_64/cmpxchg16b.rs#L58-L74).

Instead of duplicating that match, stdarch should use what we have in libcore, so let's expose that.

r? `@bjorn3`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants