Skip to content

Call out possibility of invariant result in variance markers #141612

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2025

Conversation

jhpratt
Copy link
Member

@jhpratt jhpratt commented May 26, 2025

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 26, 2025

r? @tgross35

rustbot has assigned @tgross35.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 26, 2025
@jhpratt jhpratt changed the title Call out possibility of invariant result Call out possibility of invariant result in variance markers May 26, 2025
@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 28, 2025

📌 Commit 7aef56d has been approved by tgross35

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 28, 2025
jhpratt added a commit to jhpratt/rust that referenced this pull request May 28, 2025
Call out possibility of invariant result in variance markers

ref rust-lang#135806 (comment)
jieyouxu added a commit to jieyouxu/rust that referenced this pull request May 28, 2025
Call out possibility of invariant result in variance markers

ref rust-lang#135806 (comment)
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2025
Rollup of 16 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #136429 (GCI: At their def site, actually wfcheck the where-clause & always eval free lifetime-generic constants)
 - #138139 (Emit warning while outputs is not exe and prints linkage info)
 - #141104 (Test(fs): Fix `test_eq_windows_file_type` for Windows 7)
 - #141477 (Path::with_extension: show that it adds an extension where one did no…)
 - #141533 (clean up old rintf leftovers)
 - #141612 (Call out possibility of invariant result in variance markers)
 - #141638 (Use `builtin_index` instead of hand-rolling it)
 - #141643 (ci: verify that codebuild jobs use ghcr.io)
 - #141675 (Reorder `ast::ItemKind::{Struct,Enum,Union}` fields.)
 - #141680 (replace TraitRef link memory.md)
 - #141682 (interpret/allocation: Fixup type for `alloc_bytes`)
 - #141683 (Handle ed2021 precise capturing of unsafe binder)
 - #141684 (rustbook: Bump versions of `onig` and `onig_sys`)
 - #141687 (core: unstably expose atomic_compare_exchange so stdarch can use it)
 - #141690 (Add `rustc_diagnostic_item` to `sys::Mutex` methods)
 - #141702 (Add eholk to compiler reviewer rotation)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 1c46b4a into rust-lang:master May 29, 2025
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.89.0 milestone May 29, 2025
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2025
Rollup merge of #141612 - jhpratt:phantom-docs, r=tgross35

Call out possibility of invariant result in variance markers

ref #135806 (comment)
@jhpratt jhpratt deleted the phantom-docs branch May 29, 2025 20:56
github-actions bot pushed a commit to model-checking/verify-rust-std that referenced this pull request May 30, 2025
Call out possibility of invariant result in variance markers

ref rust-lang#135806 (comment)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants