add Stdlib::Port, Stdlib::Privilegedport & Stdlib::Unprivilegedport #839
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Closed
|
might be better to have Stdlib::Port
Stdlib::Port::Privileged
Stdlib::Port::Unprivilegedhappy to change if thats prfered |
|
rebased and updated to use new type testing as per #856 |
b4ldr
force-pushed
the
type_ports
branch
2 times, most recently
from
d403488 to
0c820a5
Compare
|
I'd love to see some progress on this. FWIW, I'd love to see the alternative naming version implemented. Namely, these would be great: |
|
I did a rebase to fix the README conflict and renamed the types as suggested. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.