Skip to content

[Splicing] Tx negotiation during splicing #3736

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 23 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

optout21
Copy link
Contributor

@optout21 optout21 commented Apr 15, 2025

Implementation of transaction negotiation during splicing.
Builds on 3407 and 3443.

  • No new phase, Funded(FundedChannel) is used throughout splicing
  • Both FundedChannel and PendingV2Channel can act as a transaction constructor
  • PendingV2Channel logic is put behind a trait -- FundingTxConstructorV2
  • A RenegotiatingScope is used to store extra state during splicing
  • FundingChannel can act as a FundingTxConstructorV2, using the state from RenegotiatingScope (if present)
  • Since both FundedChannel and FundingTxConstructor has context(), context accessors are extracted into a common base trait, ChannelContextProvider (it is also shared by InitialRemoteCommitmentReceiver).

(Also relevant: #3444)

@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

ldk-reviews-bot commented Apr 15, 2025

👋 Thanks for assigning @wpaulino as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @jkczyz @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

1 similar comment
@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @jkczyz @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @jkczyz @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

1 similar comment
@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @jkczyz @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

🔔 3rd Reminder

Hey @jkczyz @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

1 similar comment
@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

🔔 3rd Reminder

Hey @jkczyz @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

🔔 4th Reminder

Hey @jkczyz @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

1 similar comment
@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

🔔 4th Reminder

Hey @jkczyz @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

🔔 5th Reminder

Hey @jkczyz @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

1 similar comment
@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

🔔 5th Reminder

Hey @jkczyz @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

🔔 6th Reminder

Hey @jkczyz @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

1 similar comment
@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

🔔 6th Reminder

Hey @jkczyz @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Copy link
Contributor

@jkczyz jkczyz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry about the late review. We were traveling to an off site last week. Just a high-level pass on the first four commits. Will need to take a closer look at the last one.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 30, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 56.30252% with 52 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 90.28%. Comparing base (8aae34e) to head (f1c280d).
Report is 15 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
lightning/src/ln/channel.rs 55.23% 46 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs 64.28% 4 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3736      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.73%   90.28%   +0.55%     
==========================================
  Files         159      160       +1     
  Lines      128910   132032    +3122     
  Branches   128910   132032    +3122     
==========================================
+ Hits       115676   119207    +3531     
+ Misses      10536    10172     -364     
+ Partials     2698     2653      -45     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@optout21 optout21 force-pushed the splice-dual-tx4 branch 3 times, most recently from 88d2e83 to 866368d Compare May 5, 2025 11:59
@optout21
Copy link
Contributor Author

optout21 commented May 6, 2025

Ready for a new round of review. I have addressed the comments, applied most of them. There is still one to-do (update channel reserve values), that I will do, but the rest is ready for review.
I did the changes in separate 'fix' commits.

@optout21
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ready for a new round of review. All pending and newly raised comments addressed.

@optout21
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm working on shared input support, can be seen in draft PR #3842 . WIP.

optout21 added 4 commits June 11, 2025 19:49
In begin_interactive_funding_tx_construction(), rename is_outbound to is_initiator,
to prevent confusion with earlier the role at channel open.
Introduce struct NegotiatingChannelView to perform transaction negotiation
logic, on top of both PendingV2Channel (dual-funded channel open) and
FundedChannel (splicing).
Fill the logic for including transaction negotiation during splicing,
implement the functions:
splice_channel, splice_init, splice_ack, funding_tx_constructed.
Also extend the test case test_v1_splice_in with the steps for
funding negotiation during splicing.
@optout21 optout21 force-pushed the splice-dual-tx4 branch 2 times, most recently from 13321b2 to cabd6be Compare June 11, 2025 18:49
optout21 added 6 commits June 11, 2025 21:32
ChannelTransactionParameters: clone only unchanged members.
Optimize checking twice for pending_splice in splice_ack.
Add Channel.as_negotiating_channel(), and use that to call into
the 5 tx_*() methods, so those could be removed from Channel.
@optout21
Copy link
Contributor Author

Comments addressed, summary of pending changes:

@wpaulino
Copy link
Contributor

Let us know when this is ready for another round, no need to wait on #3842 to get more review on this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants