Skip to content

Upgrade Wildfly Swarm to Thorntail #5

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

juangon
Copy link
Contributor

@juangon juangon commented Dec 5, 2018

Hi!

I upgraded these tests so they can pass with new Thorntail versions.

Want to highlight 2 changes made and their reasons:

@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
<payara.version>5.182-SNAPSHOT</payara.version>
<payara.micro.version>5.182-SNAPSHOT</payara.micro.version>
<liberty.version>17.0.0.4</liberty.version>
<wildfly.version>2018.4.1</wildfly.version>
<thorntail.version>2.3.0.Final-SNAPSHOT</thorntail.version>
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't be merged now then.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok better wait to 2.3.0.Final right?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, if it doesn't work with 2.2.1.Final, then we need to wait for 2.3.0.Final.

@Ladicek
Copy link

Ladicek commented Dec 5, 2018

As there could be problems when using concurrent request (it may happen that circuit isn't open when throwing the exact number of request to get expected number of requests) I changed requests to be sequential by using newSingleThread executor.

I think you should enable thorntail.microprofile.fault-tolerance.synchronous-circuit-breaker -- that enables 100% compliant behavior at the expense of probably worse performance.

@juangon
Copy link
Contributor Author

juangon commented Dec 5, 2018

As there could be problems when using concurrent request (it may happen that circuit isn't open when throwing the exact number of request to get expected number of requests) I changed requests to be sequential by using newSingleThread executor.

I think you should enable thorntail.microprofile.fault-tolerance.synchronous-circuit-breaker -- that enables 100% compliant behavior at the expense of probably worse performance.

It's enabled by default. I enabled it just in case and doesn't work.

@juangon
Copy link
Contributor Author

juangon commented Dec 5, 2018

I am gonna send PR whenever 2.3.0.Final is out so we don't use SNAPSHOT versions.

Thanks @Ladicek for the review!

@juangon juangon closed this Dec 5, 2018
@arjantijms
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @Ladicek indeed!

@juangon Will be looking forward to your next PR, thx!

@juangon
Copy link
Contributor Author

juangon commented Jan 18, 2019

Resent here: #7

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants