Skip to content

Create SQLAlchemyConnectionField through a factory method #46

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 26 commits into from
Closed

Create SQLAlchemyConnectionField through a factory method #46

wants to merge 26 commits into from

Conversation

dennylab
Copy link

@dennylab dennylab commented May 2, 2017

Overriding the constructor-method gives the user the possibility to enhance the standard implementation of connection fields. (If you want to add filtering/sorting for example)

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 91.339% when pulling e588326 on labsolutionlu:master into 030e5e1 on graphql-python:master.

3 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 91.339% when pulling e588326 on labsolutionlu:master into 030e5e1 on graphql-python:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 91.339% when pulling e588326 on labsolutionlu:master into 030e5e1 on graphql-python:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 91.339% when pulling e588326 on labsolutionlu:master into 030e5e1 on graphql-python:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 91.339% when pulling 197a96b on labsolutionlu:master into 030e5e1 on graphql-python:master.

3 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 91.339% when pulling 197a96b on labsolutionlu:master into 030e5e1 on graphql-python:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 91.339% when pulling 197a96b on labsolutionlu:master into 030e5e1 on graphql-python:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 91.339% when pulling 197a96b on labsolutionlu:master into 030e5e1 on graphql-python:master.

@dennylab dennylab closed this May 2, 2017
@palmkevin
Copy link
Contributor

We merged by accident our master instead of the branch containing the changes. Sorry for the spam, but we're new to github. A new, clean pull request has been created. See #47

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants