Skip to content

Add testifylint linter #4072

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Antonboom
Copy link
Contributor

Hi!

https://github.com/Antonboom/testifylint

  1. Supports analysis.SuggestedFix (but no integration in golangci-lint?)
  2. Supports analysis.Diagnostic.Category & URL (but no usage of this feature in golangci-lint?)

P.S. For local dev you need 1.21, but the module itself I returned to 1.20 by replacing useful package (slices) with own code 😢

@Antonboom Antonboom added the linter: new Support new linter label Sep 7, 2023
@Antonboom Antonboom requested a review from ldez September 7, 2023 17:05
@ldez
Copy link
Member

ldez commented Sep 7, 2023

In order for a pull request adding a linter to be reviewed, the linter and the PR must follow some requirements.

  • The CLA must be signed

Pull Request Description

  • It must have a link to the linter repository.
  • It must provide a short description of the linter.

Linter

  • It must not be a duplicate of another linter or a rule of a linter. (the team will help to verify that)
  • It must have a valid license (AGPL is not allowed) and the file must contain the required information by the license, ex: author, year, etc.
  • The linter repository must have a CI and tests.
  • It must use go/analysis.
  • It must have a valid tag, ex: v1.0.0, v0.1.0.
  • It must not contain init().
  • It must not contain panic().
  • It must not contain log.fatal(), os.exit(), or similar.
  • It must not modify the AST.
  • It must not have false positives/negatives. (the team will help to verify that)
  • It must have tests inside golangci-lint.

The Linter Tests Inside Golangci-lint

  • They must have at least one std lib import.
  • They must work with T=<name of the linter test file>.go make test_linters. (the team will help to verify that)

.golangci.reference.yml

  • The linter must be added to the list of available linters (alphabetical case-insensitive order).
    • enable and disable options
  • If the linter has a configuration, the exhaustive configuration of the linter must be added (alphabetical case-insensitive order)
    • The values must be different from the default ones.
    • The default values must be defined in a comment.
    • The option must have a short description.

Others Requirements

  • The files (tests and linter) inside golangci-lint must have the same name as the linter.
  • The .golangci.yml of golangci-lint itself must not be edited and the linter must not be added to this file.
  • The linters must be sorted in the alphabetical order (case-insensitive) in the Manager.GetAllSupportedLinterConfigs(...) and .golangci.reference.yml.
  • The load mode (WithLoadMode(...)):
    • if the linter doesn't use types: goanalysis.LoadModeSyntax
    • goanalysis.LoadModeTypesInfo required WithLoadForGoAnalysis() in the Manager.GetAllSupportedLinterConfigs(...)
  • The version in WithSince(...) must be the next minor version (v1.X.0) of golangci-lint.
  • WithURL() must contain the URL of the repository.

Recommendations

  • The linter should not use SSA. (SSA can be a problem with generics)
  • The linter repository should have a readme and linting.
  • The linter should be published as a binary. (useful to diagnose bug origins)

The golangci-lint team will edit this comment to check the boxes before and during the review.

The code review will start after the completion of those checkboxes (except for the specific items that the team will help to verify).

If the author of the PR is a member of the golangci-lint team, he should not edit this message.

This checklist does not imply that we will accept the linter.

@ldez ldez changed the title Feat: add testifylint linter Add testifylint linter Sep 7, 2023
knight42

This comment was marked as off-topic.

Copy link
Member

@ldez ldez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your linter contains panic and init (and the worst panic inside init)
Can you revert everything not related to the implementation of your linter (the other changes must be pushed inside another PR)?
The default value of the option enable must documented like the other linter (inside a comment)
The test file test/testdata/testifylint_test.go should be renamed to test/testdata/testifylint.go.
The presets should be only linter.PresetTest and linter.PresetBugs.
The linter should be added inside enable and disable section.

@Antonboom
Copy link
Contributor Author

Your linter contains panic and init (and the worst panic inside init)

This is a nice practice if done wisely. My init has no side effects and panic reflects the programming error, without which the linter will not start correctly. All cases covered by tests:

return fmt.Errorf("checker with empty name: %T", checker)
return fmt.Errorf("not uniq checker name: %v", name)

Examples in other linters:

etc.

Can you revert everything not related to the implementation of your linter (the other changes must be pushed inside another PR)?

Sure.

The presets should be only linter.PresetTest and linter.PresetBugs.

Not problem, but just for clarification – why the linter doesn't cover PresetStyle and PresetMetaLinter?
I was guided by the comments to the constants.

The test file test/testdata/testifylint_test.go should be renamed to test/testdata/testifylint.go.

In this case, the tests will not work because the linter ignores non-test files for performance and sanity reasons.

The linter should be added inside enable and disable section.

Sure.

@ldez
Copy link
Member

ldez commented Sep 20, 2023

My init has no side effects and panic reflects the programming error, without which the linter will not start correctly.

This is exactly why we created this rule.
Can you remove them?

@Antonboom
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ldez, fixed 👌

Could you please reopen the PR? (it was closed because of comment in Antonboom/testifylint#2 🤦)
After it should show actual state.

And what about presets question?

@Antonboom Antonboom requested a review from ldez September 24, 2023 06:08
@ldez
Copy link
Member

ldez commented Sep 24, 2023

I cannot reopen the PR, you are the only one that can do that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
linter: new Support new linter
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants