-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
Add an is_dtype
function
#199
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
10751b0
add is_type function
MarcoGorelli 27614e7
fixup
MarcoGorelli 5da9d7b
fixup sphinx
MarcoGorelli bac8540
remove Date
MarcoGorelli b8b49ce
remove temporal and string for now
MarcoGorelli e7dea4a
Merge branch 'main' into is-dtype
MarcoGorelli f4e5ef7
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into is-dtype
MarcoGorelli 13663a2
Merge branch 'is-dtype' of github.com:MarcoGorelli/dataframe-api into…
MarcoGorelli 7e1fc9d
fixup
MarcoGorelli File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the array api also allows
dtype
, but I don't think we need that here. If you want to check whether a dtype is of a specific dtype, you can just useisinstance
, e.g.I think this function is more useful for checking conceptual hierarchies, like
'integral'
So, for now, I'm only allowing
str | tuple[str, ...]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Part of the reason for allowing dtype instances is to allow arbitrary composition of dtype sets beyond the supported kinds and allow an escape hatch beyond the kinds officially supported by the array API standard.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can't you do that with
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, but that becomes a bit unwieldy quickly if you want to arbitrarily combine multiple "kinds" and/or individual dtypes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd suggest keeping this simple to begin with, we can always increase complexity later if necessary
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd have made the same comment as @kgryte, I think it'll be needed and is better than using
isinstance
. However, it's a fully backwards-compatible extension, so I'm fine with leaving this comment unresolved here and a follow-up PR to extend the functionality to: