Skip to content

Release 0.9.0 #96

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 31 commits into from
Dec 8, 2022
Merged

Release 0.9.0 #96

merged 31 commits into from
Dec 8, 2022

Conversation

ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

kchason and others added 30 commits November 23, 2022 14:43
A follow-on patch will regenerate Make-managed files.

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
No effects were observed on Make-managed files.

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
No effects were observed on Make-managed files.

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
case_sparql_select: Add --use-prefixes flag
Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
A follow-on patch will address Make-managed files.

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
This directory had not been tracking the non-dot files.

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
`flake8` 6.0.0 requires Python >= 3.8.  Python 3.7 goes EOL on
2023-06-27, so we will stay with flake8 < 6.0.0 until then.

The `flake8` issue was previously seen in case-prov PR 55.

References:
* casework/CASE-Implementation-PROV-O#55
* https://www.python.org/downloads/
* https://peps.python.org/pep-0537/

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
case_sparql_select: End output with newline
Run pre-commit autoupdate, pinning flake8 at 5.0.4
No effects were observed on Make-managed files.

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
…sv_output

case_sparql_select: Add CSV and TSV output modes
This patch is code-motion to give function names to chunks of
`case_sparql_select:main`.

Some upcoming patch series are going to add features that, when taken
together, introduce non-trivial parameter-value cross-dependencies.

Moving functionality to functions enables combinatoric testing in a
`pytest` space, rather than resorting to copying, pasting, and tweaking
many Makefile lines.  A future patch series will add the `pytest`
script.

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
No effects were observed on Make-managed files.

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
The test pattern for these features encourages an enumerative approach,
so a `pytest` script exercising the freshly broken-out functions is now
included.

No effects were observed on Make-managed files.

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
This patch addresses issues with some parameter-values being compatible
with some of the DataFrame table rendering functions, but not with
certain `orient` parameters of the JSON rendering function.  The
incompatible pairings are now caught at parameter-parsing time.

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
…d_anno_flag_testing

case_sparql_select: Cross-test JSON output and --no-(header,index) flag branches
This patch adds a test to reproduce the discovery of Issue 85.

A follow-on patch will regenerate Make-managed files.

References:
* #85

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
References:
* #85

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
References:
* https://github.com/usnistgov/opensource-repo/#codeowners

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
case_validate: Add SHACL shapes to set of CDO concepts
Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist added this to the 0.9.0 milestone Dec 8, 2022
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist marked this pull request as ready for review December 8, 2022 22:13
@kchason kchason merged commit 102c9a0 into main Dec 8, 2022
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist deleted the release-0.9.0 branch December 9, 2022 18:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants