This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 17, 2025. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This syntax is odd for c++. You are basically telling the compiler to create a empty Firebase object "fbase" then copy another anonymous Firebase object into it. So two objects + copy constructor. Copy elision should optimize this away but depending on a compiler optimization looks odd to c++ eyes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I just restored the example the way it was before.
I think moving forward we should embrace two-step initialization, which seems to be a common pattern in Arduino-land.
WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is a little more combersome but I can see how it is useful with the setup() loop() cycle. We could provide both options.
How about we call it "setup()" instead of begin though. to match the arduino function name.