Add sub_path_expr to volume mount options

[jk-f5]

Description

Added ability to declare sub_path_expr in volume mounts. I more or less just grepped for sub_path and added the equivalent code for sub_path_expr. I'm a bit shocked that this hasn't been added already.

Acceptance tests

• Have you updated an existing acceptance tests for the functionality being added?
• Have you run the acceptance tests on this branch?

Output from acceptance testing:

$ make testacc TESTARGS="-run '^TestAccKubernetes(Deployment|Pod|ReplicationController)'"
...
PASS

Release Note

Release note for CHANGELOG:

Enhancement
- Added ability to declare sub_path_expr in volume mounts. 

References

Community Note

• Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
• If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

[hashicorp-cla-app]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[jk-f5]

Can anyone tell me what I need to do to get this merged? I'd prefer not to have to continue using my own custom build of this provider if possible.

[jk-f5]

Rebased on main

[jk-f5]

Rebased on main

[jk-f5]

Rebased on main

[s-annamalai-fetch]

It would be great if we could get this merged

[jk-f5]

Rebased on main

[jk-f5]

Rebased on main

[clark42]

Thanks @jk-f5 for your work and to keeping it update!
How we can help you to have an answer from hashicorp on this and get this merged?

[jk-f5]

How we can help you to have an answer from hashicorp on this and get this merged?

I wish I knew. I'd be happy to make any changes necessary to get it merged.

[clark42]

Hello @alexsomesan, @jrhouston, and @arybolovlev,

Hope you’re all doing well this week.

Just wanted to check in regarding the PR that @jk-f5 opened a while back and has been keeping up to date.
I’m reaching out to make sure it’s still on your radar and hasn’t slipped through the cracks.
Some others issues related #920 #925

As someone who’s closely following this improvement to the Kubernetes provider, I’d really appreciate it if you could take a look when you get a chance.

Thanks a lot for your time and for everything you do on this project!

[jrhouston]

This looks good, branch needs to be rebased before I can merge it.

edit: Nevermind, conflict message went away once I approved workflows.