Skip to content

Remove SystemJS mention from Riot comparison #549

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 27, 2016
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/guide/comparison.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -324,6 +324,6 @@ Riot 2.0 provides a similar component-based development model (which is called a

- True conditional rendering. Riot renders all if branches and simply shows/hides them.
- A far more powerful router. Riot’s routing API is extremely minimal.
- More mature tooling support. Vue provides official support for [Webpack](https://github.com/vuejs/vue-loader), [Browserify](https://github.com/vuejs/vueify), and [SystemJS](https://github.com/vuejs/systemjs-plugin-vue), while Riot relies on community support for build system integration.
- More mature tooling support. Vue provides official support for [Webpack](https://github.com/vuejs/vue-loader) and [Browserify](https://github.com/vuejs/vueify), while Riot relies on community support for build system integration.
- [Transition effect system](transitions.html). Riot has none.
- Better performance. [Despite advertising](https://github.com/vuejs/vuejs.org/issues/346) use of a virtual DOM, Riot in fact uses dirty checking and thus suffers from the same performance issues as Angular 1.