Skip to content

to reduce misleading, add a note for [v-for with v-if] section #2029

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 25, 2019
Merged

to reduce misleading, add a note for [v-for with v-if] section #2029

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
3fe59eb
to reduce misleading, add a note for [v-for with v-if] section
zdsfwy Feb 23, 2019
b75b80c
move note to the top of the target section
zdsfwy Feb 24, 2019
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions src/v2/guide/list.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -441,6 +441,8 @@ Similar to template `v-if`, you can also use a `<template>` tag with `v-for` to

## `v-for` with `v-if`

<p class="tip">Note that it's **not** recommended to use `v-if` and `v-for` together. Refer to [style guide](/v2/style-guide/#Avoid-v-if-with-v-for-essential) for details.</p>

When they exist on the same node, `v-for` has a higher priority than `v-if`. That means the `v-if` will be run on each iteration of the loop separately. This can be useful when you want to render nodes for only _some_ items, like below:

``` html
Expand Down