Skip to content

Remove redundancy in reactivity-fundamentals.md #1604

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 10, 2022

Conversation

sharonytlau
Copy link
Contributor

Description of Problem

It also means that when we assign or destructure a reactive object's property into local variables, or when we pass that property into a function, or destructure properties from a reactive object, we will lose the reactivity connection:

In the above sentence, "or destructure properties from a reactive object" is redundant and may cause confusion.

Proposed Solution

Remove the redundancy:

It also means that when we assign or destructure a reactive object's property into local variables, or when we pass that property into a function, we will lose the reactivity connection:

It will make the explanation better match the code example.

The clause following the 3rd "or"  is redundant and may cause confusion. Removing it will make the explanation better match the code example.
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 7, 2022

✔️ Deploy Preview for vuejs ready!

🔨 Explore the source changes: 83405a3

🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/vuejs/deploys/62261abb72287a00078984f9

😎 Browse the preview: https://deploy-preview-1604--vuejs.netlify.app

Copy link
Contributor

@skirtles-code skirtles-code left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed, this does appear to be repeating itself. Thanks for the fix!

@skirtles-code skirtles-code merged commit dd48f00 into vuejs:main Mar 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants