fix: QA feedbacks for assigning copilots #810
Conversation
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| @@ -74,14 +74,32 @@ module.exports = [ | |||
| .update({ | |||
| status: INVITE_STATUS.CANCELED, | |||
| }) | |||
| .then((updatedInvite) => { | |||
| .then(async (updatedInvite) => { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The function passed to .then() is now marked as async, but there is no await keyword used within it. If there is no asynchronous operation inside, consider removing async to avoid unnecessary overhead.
| // update the application if the invite | ||
| // originated from copilot opportunity | ||
| if (invite.applicationId) { | ||
| const allPendingInvitesForApplication = await models.Sequelize.ProjectMemberInvite.getPendingInvitesForApplication(invite.applicationId); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider handling the case where getPendingInvitesForApplication might return an error or unexpected result. Adding error handling can prevent potential issues if the database query fails.
| // If only the current invite is the open one's | ||
| // then the application status has to be moved to pending status | ||
| if (allPendingInvitesForApplication.length === 1) { | ||
| await models.Sequelize.CopilotApplication.update({ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure that the update operation on CopilotApplication is correctly handling potential errors. Consider adding error handling to manage any exceptions that might occur during the update process.
| // update the application if the invite | ||
| // originated from copilot opportunity | ||
| if (invite.applicationId) { | ||
| req.log.info("Invite originated from the application id", invite.applicationId); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider using a more descriptive log message to provide context about the invite and its application ID. This can help in debugging and understanding the log output.
| req.log.info("Invite originated from the application id", invite.applicationId); | ||
| const allPendingInvitesForApplication = await models.Sequelize.ProjectMemberInvite.getPendingInvitesForApplication(invite.applicationId); | ||
|
|
||
| req.log.info("All pending invites which are open", allPendingInvitesForApplication); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The log message could be more descriptive. Consider including additional context, such as the application ID or the number of pending invites, to make the logs more informative.
| @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ module.exports = [ | |||
| .update({ | |||
| status: newStatus, | |||
| }) | |||
| .then((updatedInvite) => { | |||
| .then(async (updatedInvite) => { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The use of async here suggests that there might be an await call inside the function. Please ensure that any asynchronous operations inside this function are properly awaited to prevent potential issues with unhandled promises.
| // originated from copilot opportunity | ||
| if (updatedInvite.applicationId) { | ||
| req.log.info("Invite originated from the application id", invite.applicationId); | ||
| const allPendingInvitesForApplication = await models.Sequelize.ProjectMemberInvite.getPendingInvitesForApplication(invite.applicationId); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider handling the case where getPendingInvitesForApplication might return an error or null. This could prevent potential runtime errors if the function does not behave as expected.
| req.log.info("All pending invites which are open", allPendingInvitesForApplication); | ||
| // If only the current invite is the open one's | ||
| // then the application status has to be moved to pending status | ||
| if (allPendingInvitesForApplication.length === 1) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The comment 'If only the current invite is the open one's' seems unclear. Consider rephrasing for better clarity, such as 'If the current invite is the only open one'.
What's in this PR?