Skip to content

jest-dom for custom Jest matchers and blog post #100

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 1, 2018

Conversation

rkotze
Copy link
Contributor

@rkotze rkotze commented Jun 1, 2018

What:

  • Update readme example with jest-dom for custom Jest matchers
  • Link to blog post about Jest and react-test-library

Why:

dom-testing-library has custom Jest matchers for convenience however for developers using Jest and react-testing-library it should be recommended to use jest-dom.

Checklist:

  • Documentation
  • Tests "N/A"
  • Ready to be merged
  • Added myself to contributors table

rkotze added 3 commits May 31, 2018 23:50
dom-testing-library has custom Jest matchers for convenience however for developers using Jest and react-testing-library it should be recommended to use jest-dom.
Copy link
Member

@kentcdodds kentcdodds left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perfect! Thank you :)

@kentcdodds kentcdodds merged commit 0fde17f into testing-library:master Jun 1, 2018
@kentcdodds
Copy link
Member

🎉 This PR is included in version 3.1.4 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

julienw pushed a commit to julienw/react-testing-library that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2018
Now that jest-dom supports node environment I could add support for it to this package as well.

Fixes testing-library#100
lucbpz pushed a commit to lucbpz/react-testing-library that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants