Description
@testing-library/dom
version: 10.0.0 (latest)- Testing Framework and version: react-scripts ^5.0.1 (Reproducible with Vitest as well)
- DOM Environment: jsdom 16.7.0 or 16.6.0
Relevant code or config:
import React from "react";
import { render, screen, configure } from "@testing-library/react";
configure({ throwSuggestions: true });
test("React Testing Library works!", () => {
render(<p>Hello world!</p>);
const p = screen.getByText('Hello world!');
expect(p).toBeInTheDocument();
});
What you did:
Added this in all the places in the code base where the error appears, which made my tests noisy:
getByRole('paragraph', { name: (name, element) => element.textContent === 'Hello world!' });
What happened:
I got this recommendation, which is contradictory with RTL's documentation and ambiguous (not simple to query paragraphs by text):

Reproduction:
StackBlitz:
https://stackblitz.com/edit/dtl-template-zyki3r?file=src%2Fmain.test.ts
Problem description:
I have enabled suggestions in my code base, however, when trying to use getByText
as recommended in the priority list for paragraphs outside of forms, I get an error, saying:
TestingLibraryElementError: A better query is available, try this:
getByRole('paragraph')
Which makes sense, however, that recommendation made me think that I could use something like getByRole('paragraph', { name: 'Hello world!' })
but this wont work:
TestingLibraryElementError: Unable to find an accessible element with the role "paragraph" and name "Hello world!"
To solve the error I found this was possible:
getByRole('paragraph', { name: (name, element) => element.textContent === 'Hello world!' });
However this is not a simple solution as in a large codebase with slightly larger texts this would potentially become a little more unmanageable/noisy, for other APIs like Buttons or Headings we already use the name to query for the textContent of the element, e.g screen.getByRole('heading', { name: 'Hello world!', level: 1 })
would work if the paragraph was an <h1>
tag instead.
By doing some quick checks, I found that we match the name (or not) against the element using this matcher function, which uses computeAccessibleName
from the dom-accesibility-api module. In the case of the paragraph
naming is prohibited, hence that function will return an empty string which explains why we can't use the name
to query texts.
I understand this is based on the specs from the w3c however, I believe we should clarify the path forward for this kind of case.
Suggested solution:
I believe this issue was introduced after the changes on #1241 which upgrades the aria-query library from 5.1.3 to 5.3.0 with several important changes to elements including the paragraph -- before this, getByText
worked without issues and as per my tests it is because before the canSuggest
call here returned undefined
where now it returns true
because the role
argument passed is set to paragraph
instead of undefined
.
There are a few options as I can see for this issue:
-
If this change only impacts paragraphs, we can follow the recommendation from the RTL priorities for the suggestions that are made on the library and avoid the failure on the
getByText
case for paragraphs, if we go down this path I could either add thep
tag as part of the defaultIgnore "list" or add custom functionality to handle this in the getSuggestedQuery method. -
Update the documentation for RTL to suggest a path to move forward if we don't want to change the existing code, maybe using this approach or a better suggested approach by you/the community:
getByRole('paragraph', { name: (name, element) => element.textContent === 'Hello world!' });
-
Not a big fan of this option, but we could allow to query through the
name
for paragraphs within the dom-testing-library (assuming this ony affects paragraphs), by bypassing the check with thecomputeAccessibleName
method from the dom-accesibility-api just for this case, in this way we could use the getByRole method with less complexity. -
This is a big miss-understanding, there is already a solution for this that I don't know of in which case I will be more than happy to close this one out and I apologize for the waste of time if that's the case.
Glad to do any changes in the code if we find this to be an actual issue and if we agree on a path forward!
Cheers!
Update:
After some more digging, I realized that this issue may affect more than just paragraphs (reference), so some of my initial suggestions might not work since they will need to be more generic. Wondering if getByText is progressively losing value as these new changes are happening, at least within the scope of throwSuggestions: true
, maybe an update on the documentation would be best to clarify how to query paragraphs in an accesible manner to avoid the errors from getByText
? so something close to suggestion 2.