Skip to content

Add sections on possible values #6

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Add sections on possible values #6

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

wooorm
Copy link
Member

@wooorm wooorm commented Feb 11, 2016

This fix specifies which values are allowed in Unist.

Closes GH-4.

@eush77, can you review?

@wooorm wooorm added the 🐛 type/bug This is a problem label Feb 11, 2016
This fix specifies which values are allowed in Unist.

Closes GH-4.
and produce the same tree. For example, in JavaScript, a tree should
be able to be passed through `JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(tree))` and
result in the same values.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@eush77 I clarified your questions, how about this?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@wooorm Yeah, I think it's good. 👍

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👌

wooorm referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2016
This fix specifies which values are allowed in Unist.

Closes GH-4.
@wooorm wooorm closed this in 691de9c Feb 11, 2016
@wooorm wooorm deleted the fix/values branch December 20, 2016 13:03
@wooorm wooorm added ⛵️ status/released 📚 area/docs This affects documentation labels Aug 12, 2019
@wooorm wooorm added the 💪 phase/solved Post is done label Apr 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
📚 area/docs This affects documentation 💪 phase/solved Post is done 🐛 type/bug This is a problem
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

More strict notion of JSON-stringifiability for all properties
2 participants