Closed
Description
Initial checklist
- I read the support docs
- I read the contributing guide
- I agree to follow the code of conduct
- I searched issues and couldn’t find anything (or linked relevant results below)
Problem
While one
is used more by authors, historically there have been problems when using it across parsers, hence why the default is tab
.
Solution
To illustrate, one
:
1. asd
10. asdasd
100. asdasdasd
* asd
* asdasd
* asdasdasd
tab
:
1. asd
10. asdasd
100. asdasdasd
* asd
* asdasd
* asdasdasd
Note that tab
is more consistent. Especially around the 1st and 10th mark of incrementally numbered items. And the 100th, 1kth, 10kth items. Whereas one
will always be staggered. It’s probably most common to have lists between 1-99 items, hence I deem that most important.
This is mostly noticeable when trying to indent further lines: they have to match the items “bullet” \d+[\.)]\ {1,4}
.
Still, one
seems to be used more? So probably good to switch the default output format to that?
Alternatives
stay as is