Skip to content

890741: Ug Exceptions #4499

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: development
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Sreedharkumar-Panarapu
Copy link
Contributor

Feature description

Added Documentation For Handling Exceptions

Requirement and specification document.

Spec document

Task link :https://dev.azure.com/EssentialStudio/Ej2-Web/_workitems/edit/890741

API Review task

https://dev.azure.com/EssentialStudio/Ej2-Web/_workitems/edit/883352

Output screenshots

image

Feature matrix document

Feature matrix document updated against this feature and committed in this [common location] (https://syncfusion.sharepoint.com/sites/EJ2ProductOwners/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx?viewid=ae81c682%2D3d0f%2D462a%2Db8ec%2D7358748d489d&id=%2Fsites%2FEJ2ProductOwners%2FShared%20Documents%2FGeneral%2FFeature%20Matrix%20%2D%20Documents) .

  • Yes
  • NO
  • NA

Provide the details about the areas or combinations which have been tested against this code changes.

  • Tested against feature matrix.

Feature acceptance criteria (Test-case document)

Draft the test cases in excel and attach it in the MR itself. The automation must be covered based on this positive and worst-case test-cases.
Sample and exceptions.xlsx

Automation details

Mark 'Is Automated' field as (Yes, Manual, Not Applicable) in corresponding JIRA task once the feature is automated.

  • BUnit, share corresponding MR.
  • E2E or Manual Automation using tester - Make sure all items are automated with priority before release which can be tracked in automation dashboard.

Test bed sample location

Provide the test bed sample location where the code reviewers can review the new feature’s behaviors.

Feature completion checklist

UX changes got approval if UI is added or modified?

  • Yes. Provide Task link.
  • NO
  • NA

Drafted UG for this feature?

  • Yes, provide MR link.
  • NO, provide task link.
  • NA

Content team reviewed the UI content changes.

  • Yes. Provide MR or Task link.
  • NO
  • NA

Is this the common feature which needs to be addressed in the same component or on other components in our platform?

  • Yes. If we need to check in other components, tag "needs-attention-coreteam"
  • NO

Is there any existing behavior change due to this code change?

  • Yes. If So, add breaking-change label.
  • NO

Blazor Checklist

Confirm whether the ensured feature is in both Blazor Server and WASM.

  • Yes
  • NO
  • NA

Do the code changes cause any memory leak and performance issue?

  • Yes
  • NO

Reviewer Checklist

  • Reviewed feature matrix document modifications and reviewed developer testing report against the feature matrix reviewed.
  • Tested sample ensured.
  • Coverage report checked.
  • Ensured the code changes meet the coding standard.
  • Confirming script changes made in this merge request can't be achieved in C#.

Created task in Blazor to synchronize if the feature is not available and applicable.

  • NA
  • Yes, task link.
  • NO, share reason.

@Sreedharkumar-Panarapu Sreedharkumar-Panarapu added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jun 14, 2024
@SyncfusionBuild
Copy link
Contributor

Build Status: INPROGRESS 🔃
Build Location: 890741-DevUgException

@SyncfusionBuild
Copy link
Contributor

CI Status: SUCCESS ✅
Source Compilation: SUCCESS ✅
Build Location: 890741-DevUgException
Image Alt Text Error(s): 0
Image Size Error(s): 0
Image Name Error(s): 0
FT Layout Syntax Error(s): 0
Front matter Error(s): 0
File Path Error(s): 0
CodeSnippet File Path Missing Error(s): 0
Toc Anchor Tags Validation Error(s): 0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants