-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.2k
Made the code of a validation example more robust #9993
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 2 commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -59,11 +59,20 @@ The validator class is also simple, and only has one required method ``validate( | |
|
||
use Symfony\Component\Validator\Constraint; | ||
use Symfony\Component\Validator\ConstraintValidator; | ||
use Symfony\Component\Validator\Exception\UnexpectedTypeException; | ||
|
||
class ContainsAlphanumericValidator extends ConstraintValidator | ||
{ | ||
public function validate($value, Constraint $constraint) | ||
{ | ||
if (!is_string($value) && !(is_object($value) && method_exists($value, '__toString'))) { | ||
throw new UnexpectedTypeException($value, 'string'); | ||
} | ||
|
||
if ('' === $value) { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. But the There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This check must be moved before indeed, and test null. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The reason is that the constraint should not throw or invalid empty values, or it would superseed other constraints responsibility. |
||
return; | ||
} | ||
|
||
if (!preg_match('/^[a-zA-Z0-9]+$/', $value, $matches)) { | ||
// If you're using the new 2.5 validation API (you probably are!) | ||
$this->context->buildViolation($constraint->message) | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now that =I review this, I've got a comment :). If a constraint allows casting an object to null then it should do so for any scalar. What about changing
is_string
tois_scalar
? I can see that it's done here for example https://github.com/symfony/symfony/blob/master/src/Symfony/Component/Validator/Constraints/EmailValidator.php#L77.Also by convention; a constraint should not test empty value, for this a
NotNull
orNotBlank
constraint should be used. So it misses:at first.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I disagree with the proposed
is_scalar()
change. Even the error message of the validator says:The string "{{ string }}" contains an illegal character ...
so this must only work with strings, right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've added this:
Should it contain a
trim($value)
call too? Thanks!There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, casting should be ok, it's about changing the representation to make it fit, then throw an exception if it's not possible. I think we should stay consistent, if we want to keep
is_string
that strict, then let's remove the__toString()
check.Trimming is not as it alters the given value. Fortunately this will soon be opt-in symfony/symfony#26484.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@HeahDude I made more changes according to your comments. Thanks for the reviews and for your patience 🙏