Skip to content

Clarify unanimous access strategy description #9363

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Clarify unanimous access strategy description #9363

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Steveb-p
Copy link
Contributor

@Steveb-p Steveb-p commented Mar 1, 2018

In my opinion saying that unanimous strategy "requires all voters to grant access" is misleading. In actuality, this strategy requires that no voter denies access, and this PR intends to clarify that.

@javiereguiluz javiereguiluz added this to the 2.2 milestone Mar 1, 2018
@javiereguiluz javiereguiluz modified the milestones: 2.2, 2.7 Mar 1, 2018
@javiereguiluz
Copy link
Member

@Steveb-p this is a great improvement of a critical information that was misleading! I've reworded it a bit reusing parts of the Symfony code comments ... and I also merged it on 2.7 branch, which is the oldest maintained branch where this change is applicable (here you can find all maintained branches: https://symfony.com/roadmap). That's why GitHub looks it as closed instead of merged, but it's merged. Thanks!

javiereguiluz added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2018
…javiereguiluz)

This PR was submitted for the 4.0 branch but it was merged into the 2.7 branch instead (closes #9363).

Discussion
----------

Clarify unanimous access strategy description

In my opinion saying that unanimous strategy "requires all voters to grant access" is misleading. In actuality, this strategy requires that no voter denies access, and this PR intends to clarify that.

Commits
-------

b4c2e90 Minor reword
94d6f30 Clarify unanimous access strategy description
@Steveb-p Steveb-p deleted the patch-3 branch March 1, 2018 15:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants