Skip to content

Fixed the types of some options in Collection constraint #9163

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2018
Merged

Fixed the types of some options in Collection constraint #9163

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions reference/constraints/Collection.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ error will be returned. If set to ``true``, extra fields are ok.
extraFieldsMessage
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

**type**: ``boolean`` **default**: ``This field was not expected.``
**type**: ``string`` **default**: ``This field was not expected.``

The message shown if `allowExtraFields`_ is false and an extra field is
detected.
Expand All @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ option are not present in the underlying collection.
missingFieldsMessage
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

**type**: ``boolean`` **default**: ``This field is missing.``
**type**: ``string`` **default**: ``This field is missing.``

The message shown if `allowMissingFields`_ is false and one or more fields
are missing from the underlying collection.
Expand Down