Skip to content

Syntax Error on "Options FollowSymlinks" #5182

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Syntax Error on "Options FollowSymlinks" #5182

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

Balamung
Copy link
Contributor

A missing "s" made the VirtualHost crash when symlink lines were uncommented.

A missing "s" made the VirtualHost crash when symlink lines were uncommented.
@Balamung
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just learned about the whole process, I should have done this change on 2.3 branch, sorry ! :(

@xabbuh
Copy link
Member

xabbuh commented Apr 15, 2015

@Balamung Don't worry. We can easily pick your changes and merge them into the 2.3 branch though. Anyway, thank you for noticing this bug and providing a patch for it. We really appreciate it! 👍

@javiereguiluz
Copy link
Member

@Balamung nice catch! This article is very important, so it should be flawless. Thanks!

@ricardclau
Copy link
Contributor

There are actually 4 commented Apache config section with exactly the same issue. Damn you Copy / Paste!

@Balamung Can you please update those as well? Nice catch!

@Balamung
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ricardclau I updated the 3 occurences that were in the file at the moment of my fork, but since then, another one was added, and I don't find how to get the patch branch back in sync to add the 4th :(

Sorry by the way for not checking the whole page before trying to correct, my bad !

@ricardclau
Copy link
Contributor

The 4th section is like a second part of the subsection "Apache with mod_php/PHP-CGI" where it mentions the possibility to disable the .htaccess file to scratch some extra performance (You can read it here http://symfony.com/doc/current/cookbook/configuration/web_server_configuration.html)

It appears in the 2.6 branch https://github.com/symfony/symfony-docs/tree/2.6/cookbook/configuration but not in this PR, so it looks like it was added after your catch

What you need to do is to update your 2.6 fork so that it is up to date with the symfony repo one, merge it back to your branch, add this final typo and then rebase these 2 commits with your final one.

Do you need any help on these Git steps?

@Balamung
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you a lot for providing the steps !

Should be good now =)

@ricardclau
Copy link
Contributor

I think @xabbuh and @javiereguiluz will ask you to rebase your 3 commits into 1 as well but it is good to go!

@javiereguiluz
Copy link
Member

@ricardclau you are right ... but lately we no longer ask users to squash their commits. The tool we use to manage Symfony repos can do that automatically, so we don't bother users :)

@ricardclau
Copy link
Contributor

Awesome then! :)

@xabbuh
Copy link
Member

xabbuh commented Apr 17, 2015

👍

@xabbuh xabbuh mentioned this pull request Apr 23, 2015
@wouterj
Copy link
Member

wouterj commented Apr 26, 2015

Hi @Balamung! For some reason, the tool wasn't able to merge this into the 2.3 branch. I've rebased your commits and created a new PR (with you still having the credits!): #5211 I'll close this PR and merge that one. Thanks for fixing the bugs and your quick actions!

@wouterj wouterj closed this Apr 26, 2015
wouterj pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2015
wouterj added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2015
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 2.3 branch (closes #5211).

Discussion
----------

Rebase #5182

Commits
-------

de5cbc5 Rebase #5182
javiereguiluz pushed a commit to javiereguiluz/symfony-docs that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants