Skip to content

Security access_control reword #3259

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2013
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
16 changes: 13 additions & 3 deletions book/security.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -893,6 +893,14 @@ prevent any direct access to these resources from a web browser (by guessing the
ESI URL pattern), the ESI route **must** be secured to be only visible from
the trusted reverse proxy cache.

.. caution::

As you'll read in the explanation below the example, the ``ip`` option
does not restrict to a specific IP address. Instead, using the ``ip``
key means that the ``access_control`` entry will only match this IP address,
and users accessing it from a different IP address will continue down
the ``acces_control`` list.

Here is an example of how you might secure all ESI routes that start with a
given prefix, ``/esi``, from outside access:

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -951,11 +959,13 @@ Now, if the same request comes from ``127.0.0.1``:

.. _book-security-securing-channel:

Securing by Channel
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forcing a Channel (http, https)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

You can also require a user to access a URL via SSL; just use the
``requires_channel`` argument in any ``access_control`` entries:
``requires_channel`` argument in any ``access_control`` entries. If this
``access_control`` is matched and the request is using the ``http`` channel,
the user will be redirected to ``https``:

.. configuration-block::

Expand Down