Skip to content

Recommend FOSCKE instead of Ivory WYSIWYG editor #11694

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jderusse
Copy link
Member

@jderusse jderusse commented Jun 7, 2019

The Bundle IvoryCKEditorBundle was abandoned, it documentation automatically redirect to "https://symfony.com/doc/current/bundles/FOSCKEditorBundle/index.html" and this documentation contains an article explaining how to migrate from Ivory to Fos.

This PR fix Symfony Form documentation to point to FosCke instead of IvoryCke

Copy link
Member

@wouterj wouterj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for fixing our recommendations! I agree that recommending FOSCKE now as the WYSIWYG editor is the best thing to do.

Copy link
Member

@javiereguiluz javiereguiluz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@wouterj which branch should we merge this on? 3.4 or 4.2? Thanks.

@wouterj
Copy link
Member

wouterj commented Jun 7, 2019

Seems like they support 3.4 in all their versions currently: https://packagist.org/packages/friendsofsymfony/ckeditor-bundle so let's do 3.4

@wouterj wouterj added this to the 3.4 milestone Jun 7, 2019
@jderusse
Copy link
Member Author

jderusse commented Jun 7, 2019

I can handle the rebase. Or you prefer to switch the branch by yourself?

@javiereguiluz
Copy link
Member

Thanks Jérémy, but we can switch the branch while merging.

@javiereguiluz
Copy link
Member

Thanks.

@jderusse jderusse deleted the ivory-to-foscke branch April 18, 2020 10:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants