Skip to content

[Diversity] Add Voting Logic Examples #11010

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
17 changes: 17 additions & 0 deletions contributing/diversity/governance.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -72,6 +72,23 @@ For an actionable item to pass, approval from greater than 50% of the voting key
players is required. Use or management of finances/donations require at least a
two-thirds majority to pass.

For transparency and ease-of-understanding, this means only the following
combinations of votes will result in an actionable item passing:

+-----+---------+---------+
| For | Against | Abstain |
+=====+=========+=========+
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
+-----+---------+---------+
| 4 | 1 | 0 |
+-----+---------+---------+
| 3 | 2 | 0 |
+-----+---------+---------+
| 4 | 0 | 1 |
+-----+---------+---------+
| 3 | 1 | 1 |
+-----+---------+---------+
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about 3-0-2?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

3-0-2 would mean that the quorum would be 60% (less than the required 75%).


Guidance Principles
-------------------

Expand Down