Handle remaining, missing DIC Tags

[weaverryan]

This is a summary of #519 and #1320.

DIC tags that are missing and need to be added:

• assetic.filter from AsseticBundle
• assetic.asset from AsseticBundle
• assetic.formula_loader from AsseticBundle
• assetic.formula_resource from AsseticBundle
• assetic.factory_worker from AsseticBundle
• assetic.templating.twig from AsseticBundle
• assetic.templating.php from AsseticBundle
• doctrine.event_subscriber from DoctrineBundle
• doctrine.event_listener from DoctrineBundle

Changes specifically for Symfony 2.1:

• kernel.cache_clearer
• translation.dumper
• translation.extractor
• and remove security.listener.factory

Changes specificallt for Symfony 2.2:

• kernel.fragment_renderer

We need to open up issues in the respective repositories of the bundles for the following tags (double-checking to see if they're already documented before creating an issue)

• request.param_converter from SensioFrameworkExtraBundle
• security.after_invocation.provider from JMSSecurityExtraBundle
• security.secure_service from JMSSecurityExtraBundle

[iamdto]

Looks like the kernel.fragment_renderer tag is missing too. It was introduced in 2.2 (I used it recently to override the hinclude fragment render).

[wouterj]

The 2.1 specific 3th party bundle tags:

• jms_aop.pointcut from JMSAopBundle (required by both JMS bundles)
• security.expressions.function_compiler from JMSSecurityBundle
• security.expressions.type_compiler from JMSSecurityBundle
• security.expressions.variable from JMSSecurityBundle

[stof]

@wouterj these should be documented in the JMS doc instead (which are rendered on jmsyst.com). They are not in the doc currently though

[wouterj]

@stof yes, exactly. Just like the other ones at the end of Ryan's post. I mentioned it here to have one place with all missing tags that should be included in (a) the dic tag reference or (b) the docs of these almost-core bundles (which are included in the symfony site).

[wouterj]

Both request.param_converter and security.secure_service are documented and I created an issue do security.after_invocation.provider ( schmittjoh/JMSSecurityExtraBundle#125 )

[xabbuh]

JMSDiExtraBundle and JMSSecurityExtraBundle are not part of the standard edition as of Symfony 2.3. We should take this into account, shouldn't we?

[wouterj]

Yes, but they remain part of 2.1 and 2.2, so they still should get documented.