Skip to content

Really backport PRs 134 135 139 138 140 to swift-3.0-branch #146

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

das
Copy link
Contributor

@das das commented Aug 15, 2016

held github wrong in #145 and merged to the wrong branch...

seabaylea and others added 11 commits August 4, 2016 17:11
Update libpwq for fix to race condition in libpwq's test_api
Disable dispatch_read2 due to intermittent failure
…endency

Eliminate the external dependency on libBlocksRuntime.so by
copying the blocks runtime code from swift-corelibs-foundation/closure
and building it into libdispatch.  Added a configure option to control
whether or not the blocks runtime is embedded; defaults to embedded on
Linux and not embedded on other platforms.  Since the blocks runtime is
embedded; we can take the link directive out of the module.modulemap file.

This change enables dispatch to be built and run on a system without
the libblocksruntime-dev package installed.
SR-2309: embed BlocksRuntime in libdispatch to eliminate external dep…
Added Toolchain section in INSTALL.md
@das
Copy link
Contributor Author

das commented Aug 15, 2016

the ci failure is unrelated to libdispatch, it built and tested fine:

============================================================================
Testsuite summary for libdispatch 1.3
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 26
# PASS:  26

going ahead with the merge

@das das merged commit a2ba09f into swift-3.0-branch Aug 15, 2016
@das das deleted the das-swift-3.0-branch-backport-134-135-139-138-140 branch May 25, 2017 12:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants