Skip to content

Implementation of most of the API for Progress. #679

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2016

Conversation

parkera
Copy link
Contributor

@parkera parkera commented Oct 10, 2016

This implementation is based on the Darwin NSProgress implementation. One important detail is that swift-corelibs-foundation we do not have Key-Value Observing (KVO) yet. In the meantime, it is suggested to use polling or some other mechanism to read the values.

Updates along the parent/child relationship in Progress are working.

One additional thing that remains is an implementation of the localizedDescription methods. These are customized based on the contents of the userInfo dictionary.

@parkera
Copy link
Contributor Author

parkera commented Oct 10, 2016

@swift-ci please test

This implementation is based on the Darwin NSProgress implementation. One important detail is that swift-corelibs-foundation we do not have Key-Value Observing (KVO) yet. In the meantime, it is suggested to use polling or some other mechanism to read the values.

Updates along the parent/child relationship in Progress are working.

One additional thing that remains is an implementation of the
localizedDescription methods. These are customized based on the contents
of the userInfo dictionary.
@parkera
Copy link
Contributor Author

parkera commented Oct 10, 2016

@swift-ci please test

@parkera parkera merged commit d32f2e1 into swiftlang:master Oct 11, 2016
@parkera parkera mentioned this pull request Oct 12, 2016
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants