-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 113
refactor #13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All in all this makes further work much easier. Thanks.
I've added some comments. Most of them are probably failures in understanding at my side.
motivation: make lambda execution sequence easier to reason about changes: * add `peekFailure` extension to `EventLoopFuture` to handle error without side effects * update process chain to make use of `peekFailure`
motivation: make lambda execution sequence easier to reason about changes: * add `peekFailure` extension to `EventLoopFuture` to handle error without side effects * update process chain to make use of `peekFailure`
motivation: make lambda execution sequence easier to reason about changes: * add `peekFailure` extension to `EventLoopFuture` to handle error without side effects * update process chain to make use of `peekFailure`
motivation: make lambda execution sequence easier to reason about changes: * add `peekFailure` extension to `EventLoopFuture` to handle error without side effects * update process chain to make use of `peekFailure`
motivation: make lambda execution sequence easier to reason about changes: * add `peekFailure` extension to `EventLoopFuture` to handle error without side effects * update process chain to make use of `peekFailure`
95383be
to
8fe2986
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wow. Looking way better than before. Most comments are about a potential memory leak that I can see and otherwise just ensuring state.
@fabianfett I think this is ready for final review/merge |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm very happy with this!
motivation: safer concurrency, better tests
changes: