-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 836
refactor: update benchmarks in stats/base
to follow latest project conventions
#4299
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…roject conventions --- type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report: - task: lint_filenames status: passed - task: lint_editorconfig status: passed - task: lint_markdown status: na - task: lint_package_json status: na - task: lint_repl_help status: na - task: lint_javascript_src status: na - task: lint_javascript_cli status: na - task: lint_javascript_examples status: na - task: lint_javascript_tests status: na - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: passed - task: lint_python status: na - task: lint_r status: na - task: lint_c_src status: na - task: lint_c_examples status: na - task: lint_c_benchmarks status: na - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na - task: lint_shell status: na - task: lint_typescript_declarations status: na - task: lint_typescript_tests status: na - task: lint_license_headers status: passed ---
i can update this after #4287, #4292 and #4293 are merged, here's the PR you requested @Planeshifter, thanks for pointing out the issues! |
Coverage Report
The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR. |
kgryte
approved these changes
Dec 27, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Thanks for following up on this, @aayush0325!
Planeshifter
referenced
this pull request
Dec 27, 2024
…base/snanmin` PR-URL: #4292 Reviewed-by: Philipp Burckhardt <pburckhardt@outlook.com>
Neerajpathak07
pushed a commit
to Neerajpathak07/stdlib
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 1, 2025
…conventions PR-URL: stdlib-js#4299 Reviewed-by: Athan Reines <kgryte@gmail.com>
ShabiShett07
pushed a commit
to ShabiShett07/stdlib
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 26, 2025
…conventions PR-URL: stdlib-js#4299 Reviewed-by: Athan Reines <kgryte@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves None
Description
This pull request:
stats/base
@private
annotationRelated Issues
This pull request:
Questions
No.
Other
No.
Checklist
@stdlib-js/reviewers