Skip to content

docs(code-style-guide): Add unit test function name rule #667

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 19, 2024

Conversation

Techassi
Copy link
Member

This PR adds a rule for naming unit test functions.

@Techassi Techassi self-assigned this Sep 19, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Deploy Preview for stackable-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 2b493e6
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/stackable-docs/deploys/66ec1d5a962a1f0008868ec5
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-667--stackable-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

NickLarsenNZ
NickLarsenNZ previously approved these changes Sep 19, 2024
Copy link
Member

@NickLarsenNZ NickLarsenNZ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, made a suggestion on the paragraph.

Co-authored-by: Nick <10092581+NickLarsenNZ@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Member

@NickLarsenNZ NickLarsenNZ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Techassi Techassi added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 19, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 660cde8 Sep 19, 2024
7 checks passed
@Techassi Techassi deleted the docs/add-unit-test-function-name-rule branch September 19, 2024 13:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants