Skip to content

Consistent descriptions for ConfigurationClass #970

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

wilkinsona
Copy link
Member

Previously, a ConfigurationClass created from AnnotationMetadata
and a ConfigurationClass created from a class would have subtly
different descriptions. Given a class named com.example.Foo, the
former’s description would be “com.example.Foo”, whereas the latter’s
description would be “class com.example.Foo”.

This commit updates ConfigurationClass to make the description
consistent, preferring the description without “class” in it.

Previously, a ConfigurationClass created from AnnotationMetadata
and a ConfigurationClass created from a class would have subtly
different descriptions. Given a class named com.example.Foo, the
former’s description would be “com.example.Foo”, whereas the latter’s
description would be “class com.example.Foo”.

This commit updates ConfigurationClass to make the description
consistent, preferring the description without “class” in it.
@snicoll snicoll closed this in 65d144b Feb 19, 2016
snicoll added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2016
* pr/970:
  Consistent descriptions for ConfigurationClass
@snicoll
Copy link
Member

snicoll commented Feb 19, 2016

Thank you!

@snicoll snicoll self-assigned this Feb 19, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants