Skip to content

DATAREDIS-500 - executePipelined with RedisCallback uses wrong serializer (RedisTemplate.java) #190

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

argszero
Copy link
Contributor

RedisTemplate.java: executePipelined with RedisCallback uses wrong serializer when hashKeySerializer is different from hashValueSerializer

…izer (RedisTemplate.java)

`RedisTemplate.java`: `executePipelined` with `RedisCallback` uses wrong `serializer` when `hashKeySerializer` is different from `hashValueSerializer`
…izer (RedisTemplate.java)

`RedisTemplate.java`: `executePipelined` with `RedisCallback` uses wrong `serializer` when `hashKeySerializer` is different from `hashValueSerializer`
…izer (RedisTemplate.java)

`RedisTemplate.java`: `executePipelined` with `RedisCallback` uses wrong `serializer` when `hashKeySerializer` is different from `hashValueSerializer`
@christophstrobl
Copy link
Member

thanks @argszero for spotting this one - would you (if you have not done so yet) please sign the Contributor’s License Agreement and add your confirmation number either to this PR or DATAREDIS-500. I can then take it from here.

@argszero
Copy link
Contributor Author

argszero commented May 5, 2016

Hi @christophstrobl ,confirmation number is: 174020160421053943

mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2016
…ate executePipelined(…).

RedisTemplate executePipelined(RedisCallback) uses now the Hash Key and Hash Value serializers to deserialize the response.

Original pull request: #190.
CLA: 174020160421053943 (Name not known)
mp911de added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2016
Apply formatting rules. Use differing serializers in test.

Original pull request: #190.
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2016
…ate executePipelined(…).

RedisTemplate executePipelined(RedisCallback) uses now the Hash Key and Hash Value serializers to deserialize the response.

Original pull request: #190.
CLA: 174020160421053943 (Anqing Shao).
mp911de added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2016
Apply formatting rules. Use differing serializers in test.

Original pull request: #190.
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2016
…ate executePipelined(…).

RedisTemplate executePipelined(RedisCallback) uses now the Hash Key and Hash Value serializers to deserialize the response.

Original pull request: #190.
CLA: 174020160421053943 (Anqing Shao).
mp911de added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2016
Apply formatting rules. Use differing serializers in test.

Original pull request: #190.
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2016
…ate executePipelined(…).

RedisTemplate executePipelined(RedisCallback) uses now the Hash Key and Hash Value serializers to deserialize the response.

Original pull request: #190.
CLA: 174020160421053943 (Anqing Shao).
mp911de added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2016
Apply formatting rules. Use differing serializers in test.

Original pull request: #190.
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2016
…ate executePipelined(…).

RedisTemplate executePipelined(RedisCallback) uses now the Hash Key and Hash Value serializers to deserialize the response.

Original pull request: #190.
CLA: 174020160421053943 (Anqing Shao).
mp911de added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2016
Apply formatting rules. Use differing serializers in test.

Original pull request: #190.
@mp911de
Copy link
Member

mp911de commented Jun 17, 2016

Thanks for your contribution. That's merged, polished and backported.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants