Skip to content

DATAMONGO-2096 - Fix target field name for GraphLookup aggregation operation. #613

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

christophstrobl
Copy link
Member

We mow make sure to use the target field name instead of the alias when processing GraphLookupOperation.

…eration.

We mow make sure to use the target field name instead of the alias when processing GraphLookupOperation.
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2018
…eration.

We now make sure to use the target field name instead of the alias when processing GraphLookupOperation.

Original pull request: #613.
mp911de added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2018
Migrate assertions to AssertJ.

Original pull request: #613.
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2018
…eration.

We now make sure to use the target field name instead of the alias when processing GraphLookupOperation.

Original pull request: #613.
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2018
…eration.

We now make sure to use the target field name instead of the alias when processing GraphLookupOperation.

Original pull request: #613.
mp911de added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2018
Migrate assertions to AssertJ.

Original pull request: #613.
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2018
…eration.

We now make sure to use the target field name instead of the alias when processing GraphLookupOperation.

Original pull request: #613.
mp911de added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2018
Migrate assertions to AssertJ.

Original pull request: #613.
@mp911de
Copy link
Member

mp911de commented Oct 5, 2018

That's polished, merged, and backported now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants