Skip to content

DATAMONGO-1269 - Retain position parameter in property path. #314

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

christophstrobl
Copy link
Member

We now retain position parameters in paths used in queries when mapping the fieldname. This allows to map list.1.name to the name property of the first element in the list.
The change also fixes a glitch in mapping java.util.Map like structures having numeric keys.

We now retain position parameters in paths used in queries when mapping the fieldname. This allows to map "list.1.name" to the name property of the first element in the list. 
The change also fixes a glitch in mapping java.util.Map like structures having numeric keys.
christophstrobl added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2015
We now retain position parameters in paths used in queries when mapping the field name. This allows to map "list.1.name" to the name property of the first element in the list.

The change also fixes a glitch in mapping java.util.Map like structures having numeric keys.

Original pull request: #314.
odrotbohm added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2015
Original pull request: #314.
christophstrobl added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2015
We now retain position parameters in paths used in queries when mapping the field name. This allows to map "list.1.name" to the name property of the first element in the list.

The change also fixes a glitch in mapping java.util.Map like structures having numeric keys.

Original pull request: #314.
odrotbohm added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2015
Original pull request: #314.
@mp911de mp911de deleted the issue/DATAMONGO-1269 branch February 10, 2016 11:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant