Skip to content

DATACMNS-1007 - Is empty is not empty #203

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

DATACMNS-1007 - Is empty is not empty #203

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

BigMichi1
Copy link
Contributor

add IsEmpty and IsNotEmpty keyword parsing

@BigMichi1 BigMichi1 changed the title Is empty is not empty DATACMNS-1007 - Is empty is not empty Mar 13, 2017
odrotbohm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2017
The query derivation mechanism now detects IsEmpty and NotIsEmpty as keywords and exposes them in the PartTree.

Original pull request: #203.
odrotbohm added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2017
Moved the enum declaration to a more appropriate position. Moved the author addition to the part of the codebase that was actually changed. Expanded copyright year.

Moved unit tests to more appropriate position. Added another one to make sure a reference to a boolean property "empty" can still be supported by adding an explicit Is to make sure we detect a simple property reference.

Original pull request: #203.
odrotbohm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2017
The query derivation mechanism now detects IsEmpty and NotIsEmpty as keywords and exposes them in the PartTree.

Original pull request: #203.
odrotbohm added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2017
Moved the enum declaration to a more appropriate position. Moved the author addition to the part of the codebase that was actually changed. Expanded copyright year.

Moved unit tests to more appropriate position. Added another one to make sure a reference to a boolean property "empty" can still be supported by adding an explicit Is to make sure we detect a simple property reference.

Original pull request: #203.
@odrotbohm
Copy link
Member

Polished and merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants