Skip to content

Configure suitable TaskExecutor for WebSocket when virtual threads are enabled #39611

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

BenchmarkingBuffalo
Copy link
Contributor

For WebSocket support the preconfigured ThreadExecutor is set for ChannelRegistrations similar to the JpaRepositoriesAutoConfiguration.

See gh-39314

For WebSocket support the preconfigured ThreadExecutor is set for ChannelRegistrations similar to the JpaRepositoriesAutoConfiguration.

See spring-projectsgh-39314
@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Feb 17, 2024
@BenchmarkingBuffalo BenchmarkingBuffalo force-pushed the 39314-websocket-virtual-threads branch from 1c2d6c4 to e9bf2b3 Compare February 19, 2024 17:38
@mhalbritter mhalbritter changed the title Configure suitable TaskExecutor for WebSocket Configure suitable TaskExecutor for WebSocket when virtual threads are enabled Feb 20, 2024
@mhalbritter mhalbritter added type: enhancement A general enhancement and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Feb 20, 2024
@mhalbritter mhalbritter self-assigned this Feb 20, 2024
@mhalbritter mhalbritter added this to the 3.3.x milestone Feb 20, 2024
mhalbritter pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2024
For WebSocket support the preconfigured ThreadExecutor is set for
ChannelRegistrations similar to the JpaRepositoriesAutoConfiguration.

See gh-39611
@mhalbritter mhalbritter modified the milestones: 3.3.x, 3.3.0-M2 Feb 20, 2024
@mhalbritter
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants