Skip to content

Fixed typographical error, changed Buddist to Buddhist in README. #136

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2015
Merged

Fixed typographical error, changed Buddist to Buddhist in README. #136

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ Let's expand this example out to be multifacted, albeit somewhat contrived:
val status = if (religion == "Pentecostalist") "Beer forbidden" else if (age < 18) "Underage" else "Beer for you"
```

Now we would get 100% code coverage for passing in the values ("Buddist", 34).
Now we would get 100% code coverage for passing in the values ("Buddhist", 34).

That's why in scoverage we focus on statement coverage, and don't even include line coverage as a metric.
This is a paradigm shift that we hope will take hold.
Expand Down