Single-sourcing the package version, user-agent and bug fixes #24
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Amazing upgrades here @fatihkurtoglu - I had already bumped to v1.0.2 yesterday (sorry I wasn't clear there) and then I had one comment about our versioning logic but all the important stuff is looking great.
setup.py
Outdated
| else: | ||
| raise RuntimeError("Unable to find a valid __version__ string in %s." % rel_path) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this a cool python trick to put else: after a for loop or was the tab indentation just off here? I suppose we could just have it be raise without the else: to the same effect?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, for/else is a pythonic way. else statement is triggered when the loop ends until the end without any interruption (break/return). More like a then stage for the loop.
Yes, it's the same as just keeping the raise there as you said, I'll update it.
|
@shaun-scale Made the changes regarding version bump and for/else statement. |
Summary of changes in separate commits as follows:
create_projectand missing payload inupdate_project)buildfolder from the repo. It's only required while building locally, similar todistfolderUser-Agentparameter in request headers with module version, Python version and OS details. Sample:_version.pyaccording to common practices:_version.pywill have a line for version in__version__variablescaleapi.__version__as in most packagessetup.pyfileVersion bumped to
1.0.2in file but will be built and uploaded to pypi after merge.