Skip to content

Fix #6946: Fix generic signature for synthetic function types #6948

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 28, 2019

Conversation

odersky
Copy link
Contributor

@odersky odersky commented Jul 27, 2019

Generic signature generation did not take synthetic functions into account.

I lack the techniques how to test this. Maybe somebody else can add a test?

@smarter If the fix works, do we need then a new reference compiler before we can use IFTs in Reporter?

@smarter
Copy link
Member

smarter commented Jul 27, 2019

I lack the techniques how to test this. Maybe somebody else can add a test?

The test in b129009 should be easy to extend.

If the fix works, do we need then a new reference compiler before we can use IFTs in Reporter?

Yes, I think so.

@odersky odersky merged commit 3b55aa9 into scala:master Jul 28, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants