Skip to content

Improve documentation on refinement/recursive types #4919

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 10, 2018

Conversation

abeln
Copy link
Contributor

@abeln abeln commented Aug 9, 2018

No description provided.

@abeln abeln requested a review from smarter August 9, 2018 22:44
Copy link
Contributor

@Blaisorblade Blaisorblade left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, very good! Do you mind if I merge this and take it off @smarter’s plate? It’s pretty full!

@abeln
Copy link
Contributor Author

abeln commented Aug 10, 2018

Thanks for taking a look. By all means, feel free to merge: apologies for spamming @smarter!

@abeln abeln removed the request for review from smarter August 10, 2018 00:31
@Blaisorblade Blaisorblade merged commit 9b7721c into scala:master Aug 10, 2018
@Blaisorblade
Copy link
Contributor

Useful contributions are not spam! Thanks a lot!

@abeln abeln deleted the refined-type-comment branch August 10, 2018 07:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants